Preview release. These docs are a work in progress. Pages are still being written, links may break, and structure may shift without notice. Treat everything here as a draft and report issues on GitHub.
Evidence issuance, end to end
This page describes how Registry Notary turns a subject identifier and a configured claim into a signed evaluation or verifiable credential. It is an explanation, not a how-to: there are no commands here. For commands, see Run Registry Notary locally and Configure a claim.
Why issue credentials at all
Section titled “Why issue credentials at all”Programs and services need to know whether a person qualifies for something. The classic way to answer that question is to demand records: birth certificates, land titles, tax statements. The records carry far more information than the answer requires, the records live in registries the program does not own, and the records cross trust boundaries every time a copy moves. A credential lets a registry answer one question (does this subject satisfy this rule) without shipping the records that justify the answer. Registry Notary is the component that produces those credentials.
The claim model in one diagram
Section titled “The claim model in one diagram”A single claim evaluation moves through five stages.
The configuration that makes each stage concrete is the ClaimDefinition in
demo/config/registry-notary.yaml.
Each ClaimDefinition names its source_bindings, declares its rule, sets its disclosure
policy, and lists the formats it may emit.
Four ways to consume an evaluation
Section titled “Four ways to consume an evaluation”There is one claim model and four transports a caller can use to land a credential, delegated evaluation, or receipt.
- Direct API. The caller calls
POST /claims/evaluateto evaluate the claim, thenPOST /credentials/issueto materialize an SD-JWT VC from the stored evaluation. The caller is a backend (a program registry, a benefits portal) that holds a Registry Notary API key or an OIDC token. The credential ends up wherever the calling backend chooses to send it. - OID4VCI offer flow. The caller is a wallet, not a backend. Registry Notary publishes
/.well-known/openid-credential-issuerso the wallet learns the credential endpoint, the nonce endpoint, and the supported credential configurations. The wallet (or a portal acting on the wallet’s behalf) fetches aCredentialOfferfromGET /oid4vci/credential-offer, the user authenticates at the configured authorization server, the wallet callsPOST /oid4vci/nonceto get ac_nonce, signs a proof-of-possession JWT with itsdid:jwkkey, and posts the bearer access token plus the proof toPOST /oid4vci/credential. The choreography is implemented in the Notary server’s API module atcrates/registry-notary-server/src/api.rs. - Verifiable receipt only. The caller does not need a credential at all. It calls
POST /claims/evaluate, accepts the disclosure mode the claim allows (oftenpredicateorredacted), and stores the audit-stamped result. Every evaluation, credential or not, is recorded in the JSONL audit log alongsideverification_idandclaim_hashfor redacted results. - Federated delegated evaluation. The caller is another configured Registry Notary. It posts a
compact signed JWT to
POST /federation/v1/evaluations; the serving Notary verifies peer policy, replay state, purpose, profile, and audience before source reads, then returns a compact signed JWT response. This path returns a scoped evaluation result, not a credential.
The Registry Lab citizen self-attestation scenario uses path 2: a
host-side Notary on port 4321 runs against the lab’s civil registry, eSignet provides the
access token, and a wallet completes the OID4VCI flow.
Selective disclosure properties
Section titled “Selective disclosure properties”Selective disclosure is the property that distinguishes an SD-JWT VC from a plain JWT. Three mechanics make it work.
- Per-field disclosures. Registry Notary wraps each claim field in its own SD-JWT disclosure blob. The signed credential body carries the SHA-256 digest of every disclosure, not the disclosure value. The holder chooses which disclosures to present to which verifier; the unselected fields stay hidden.
- SHA-256 digests. The digest list is what the credential’s signature covers. A verifier checks the signature, recomputes the digest of every presented disclosure, and confirms each digest appears in the signed list. There is no way for a holder to mint a disclosure that was not in the original credential.
- Holder binding via
did:jwk. The credential’scnfclaim names the holder’s public key as adid:jwk. To present the credential, the holder must produce a fresh signed proof from that key, audience-bound to the verifier. A stolen credential without the matching private key is not presentable.
Where this fits with Relay
Section titled “Where this fits with Relay”Registry Notary is an independently deployable HTTP service. A program does not need to run Registry Relay to use Registry Notary. The link between the two is metadata, not code.
Registry Relay surfaces evidence-offering metadata under /metadata/evidence-offerings/{id}.
The metadata document points at a Registry Notary instance, names the claim ids the offering
covers, and describes the supported disclosure modes and formats. A consumer that finds an
offering on Relay learns where to call Notary; nothing in the Relay code path issues
credentials. For the publishing side, see
Publishing pipeline.
For delegated evaluation, Registry Manifest can also publish federation and
evaluation_profiles metadata. That metadata helps a partner configure a static peer relationship.
Runtime access still comes from the serving Notary federation.peers policy, signed request
verification, and replay checks.
Boundaries
Section titled “Boundaries”A few things Registry Notary is not.
- Not an eligibility decision. The verification receipt is an evidence artifact. The issuing program, not Registry Notary, converts a verified claim into an entitlement, a payment, or a benefit.
- Not a wallet. Registry Notary issues credentials. The wallet that stores, presents, and unlocks them is a separate component, owned by the holder.
- Not a credential authority. The DID, the verification key, the credential profile config, and the relationship to the relying party belong to the deployment, not to Registry Notary as a product. Registry Notary ships an engine and a wire shape; the trust comes from the deployment.
- Not open federation. The MVP accepts only statically configured peers and delegated evaluation. Federated credential issuance and dynamic trust-chain discovery are not implemented.