Skip to content
Registry StackDocsv0.38.0

Performance

View as Markdown

Status: Measured, with group commit implemented; not a Version 1 contract Date: 2026-08-03

Evidence Gateway trades request throughput for audit durability. This file records what that trade costs, how it was measured, and the change that recovered most of the cost without weakening the guarantee: group commit in the audit writer, implemented by the file destination of AuditWriter in registry-platform-audit and used through Evidence Gateway’s event boundary in crates/registry-evidence/src/audit.rs. The current end-to-end measurement lives in OPERATOR-CONTRACT.md under “Measured throughput”. Nothing here is a Version 1 commitment. Throughput is not a Definition of Done row and is not a CONCEPT.md non-goal.

The security invariant matrix requires that the disclosure-release record be durably accepted before the response bytes reach the caller, and that the access record be durably accepted before source access. The AuditWriter file destination implements this by calling sync_all for the batch that contains each append before that append resolves.

The result is two append durability obligations per successful request. Their barriers are serialized, but concurrent requests can share one barrier.

The stdout destination ends its append at write_all plus flush and hands durability to the collector reading the stream, so it is outside this measurement. The next section records the historical Evidence Gateway ceiling that motivated group commit.

This section records the measurement that motivated group commit and is kept as the before-figure. Measured with soak_reports_request_throughput_against_the_audit_ceiling in crates/registry-evidence/src/runtime_tests.rs. Two release-profile runs, 512 requests at 32 concurrent, against a local mock source, with each append taking its own barrier:

run 1run 2
Observed request rate122 rps161 rps
Measured audit ceiling131 rps163 rps
Mock source floor57,461 rps77,256 rps
Latency p50 / p95 / p99260 / 293 / 308 ms196 / 212 / 225 ms
Share of audit ceiling93%99%

Host: Apple M5 Max, 18 logical cores, APFS, macOS.

Attribution is unambiguous. The source served roughly 450 times faster than the observed request rate, so it contributes nothing. Observed throughput sits at 93 to 99 percent of what the audit log could sustain. Little’s law agrees from the other side: 32 concurrent divided by 161 rps is 199 ms against a measured 196 ms p50, so nearly all request latency is queueing on the audit mutex rather than work.

Per-append cost is 3.1 to 3.8 ms.

On macOS, File::sync_all issues F_FULLFSYNC, a true device write barrier. On Linux the same call is an ordinary fsync, which on NVMe is far cheaper. These figures are a macOS floor and must be re-measured on the target Linux host before they are quoted as production numbers or used to justify the group commit work.

Opening an AuditWriter file destination takes an exclusive lock on <path>.lock, so one process owns one audit path. Nothing else is shared between requests. N processes with N distinct audit paths therefore give N times the throughput with no code change. Only vertical throughput is capped.

The lever for vertical throughput is batching the barrier, not removing it. The AuditWriter file destination in crates/registry-platform-audit/src/writer.rs implements this. Appends that arrive while a durable write is in flight form the next batch, and one fsync covers the whole batch. There is no timer and no configured window; a batch is exactly what queued behind the in-flight barrier, so the writer degrades to one barrier per append when requests do not overlap.

Properties that survived the change are held by platform storage tests and Evidence Gateway boundary tests:

  • durability before release: an append resolves only after the barrier that covers its own bytes has completed, so no caller receives evidence ahead of its durable record;
  • exactly once: batching must not drop or duplicate an entry;
  • fail-closed: a failed barrier fails every append it covers, none of them may report success, and the writer refuses every later append;
  • external-change detection: the pinned identity and fingerprint checks bracket the batched write, and rotation happens between batches so each sealed file holds only whole entries.

The gain scales with concurrent arrivals rather than helping a single idle request. With group commit in place, the end-to-end measurement in OPERATOR-CONTRACT.md under “Measured throughput” sustained 7057 requests/second at 128 concurrent on the same host class that measured the baseline rows in this file, with both durable audit appends per request kept.

The macOS caveat still applies to every figure in this file and in OPERATOR-CONTRACT.md: re-measure on the target Linux host before quoting production numbers.

The principal regression tests cover both shared storage and its Evidence Gateway use:

  • concurrent_appends_share_durable_writes and size_rotation_seals_segments_and_keeps_every_entry in the platform writer prove that concurrent appends share one durable write and that online rotation keeps every entry.

  • concurrent_evidence_requests_write_every_audit_entry_once runs in CI. It drives simultaneous evaluations and asserts every entry written exactly once, two entries per release, and a distinct evidence identity per request. Any dropped or duplicated entry under concurrency fails it.

  • soak_reports_request_throughput_against_the_audit_ceiling is #[ignore] and opt-in. It reports rates and asserts only correctness, because throughput thresholds are host properties and would otherwise be a source of flakes:

Terminal window
cargo test -p registry-evidence --lib --release -- --ignored --nocapture soak_reports

Record the host alongside any figure taken from it.

The stdout audit destination was read, not benchmarked. Any claim that it is materially faster on this axis is inference from the absent sync_all, not a measurement. The measurements in this file were taken before Evidence Gateway moved to the shared AuditWriter and have not been repeated since.